Re: unattended-upgrades by default?
Ian Jackson, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 23:45:37 +0000, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault writes ("Re: unattended-upgrades by default?"):
> > SZALAY Attila, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 20:54:26 +0100, wrote:
> > > If we replace postgresql with postfix, that is much more closer to the
> > > standard. And I guess, that postgresql is just a "misspelling".
> >
> > Ew. Yes, sure :)
>
> Oh! Well, reading it again then, I think this is a bug (quite a
> serious bug, since it leads to incorrect bouncing of mail) in the
> postfix/mysql integration.
FTR, it's #739636.
Samuel
Reply to: