Re: When should we https our mirrors?
]] Philipp Kern
> On 10/18/2016 06:47 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Oct 17, Ian Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Have we gotten to the point where we consider deb.d.o suitable for
> >> production use? The web page still says Experimental (so I would assume
> > I do not think that it is appropriate for general use, since at least
> > one of the CDNs backing it lacks nodes in many (most) countries.
> > I like to get my Debian packages over peering links. :-)
> It's also a little awkward that apt does not tell you which of the SRV
> records it picked. (The "and why" is clear: round robin.) I had a short
> read earlier today and I had no idea how to even report it without that
> information. (Of course I know how to turn on debugging but then it
> picked a different one and succeeded.)
Even getting the SRV record won't help much, you want to know what IP it
resolved to and what headers you got from the backend to uniquely
identify problems with a single POP or machine in a POP.
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are