On 10/18/2016 06:47 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 17, Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> wrote: >> Have we gotten to the point where we consider deb.d.o suitable for >> production use? The web page still says Experimental (so I would assume > I do not think that it is appropriate for general use, since at least > one of the CDNs backing it lacks nodes in many (most) countries. > I like to get my Debian packages over peering links. :-) It's also a little awkward that apt does not tell you which of the SRV records it picked. (The "and why" is clear: round robin.) I had a short read earlier today and I had no idea how to even report it without that information. (Of course I know how to turn on debugging but then it picked a different one and succeeded.) Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature