Re: Keysafe dynamic UID
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:06:30 +0200, Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
wrote:
>I might be completely wrong, but the way I read the current situation
>is:
>
> * The (previous) proponents of the Debian- prefixed names don't
> mind much because they are fine delegating that decision to
> someone else, they just want this decided (?).
> * Many maintainers are cargo-culting the Debian- prefixed names,
> so it spreads, giving the impression that this is favoured, when
> it is probably due to being unaware of there being a better
> alternative.
I think that I am still uploader for the most prominent package in
Debian using the Debian-foo scheme, and I also remember having written
a document outlining the decision we as a team made thirteen years
ago. I have to admit that I didn't include that document in the
package, it's just on the Wiki.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: