Re: Keysafe dynamic UID
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Keysafe dynamic UID"):
> I might be completely wrong, but the way I read the current situation
> is:
>
> * The (previous) proponents of the Debian- prefixed names don't
> mind much because they are fine delegating that decision to
> someone else, they just want this decided (?).
Until I read this thread I didn't have an opinion. I suspect I may
even have perpetrated Debian-XXX myself once or twice. But the
arguments put forward for "_XXX" over "Debian-XXX", are very
convincing to me.
If someone who wants to push this needs me to put my name to a formal
policy proposal, you'll have my support.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: