Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?"):
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:11:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The reactions of others is not about the spelling difference, which is
> > obviously trivial. It's about the refusal to change, the insistence on
> > mislabeling something, and the surprising anger and oddly twisted defenses
> > that ensue afterwards, making it clear that this is a marker of something
> > much deeper and much darker than just a trivial mistake.
> So... a shibboleth. ;)
Maybe the list software could be configured to use this helpful marker
inexplicably placed on useless and inflammatory messages by their very
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.