Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Xen wrote:
>> If that is the case then they have enbedded hostility into their name simply
>> becaus eit offends normal grammar roles.
>
> I don't that's it at all.
>
> The reason many people react to the SystemD spelling is becuase, for
> some years now, trolls use that spelling when harrassing others about
> systemd.
>
> Calling it SystemD indicates to many people that you're the kind of
> person show turns up from nowhere, and starts spreading fear,
> uncertainty, and doubt about systemd, or presenting conspiracy
> theories about it, or making ad hominem attacks on its authors. People
> with bad experiences from previous systemd discussions will assume
> you're that kind of troll, regardless of the value of any of your
> claims or statements may have. Or at least I do.
Those reading so much into such a small and understandable
capitalization mistake (SystemV -> SystemD) should learn to take
themselves less seriously and view things from different perspectives.
Reply to: