Re: Use and abuse of the unreproducible tag
Hello,
On 13 September 2016 at 12:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> Dear Santiago,
>
> Thanks for publicly shaming me, makes me feel much better about your
> bugreports.
>
> On 09/13/2016 01:49 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > You can't reproduce it, or you don't want to reproduce it?
>
> I added the tag because I couldn't reproduce the issue in unstable where
> we build our packages. It's great that it's reproducible in testing, but
> we don't upload to testing. I consider the tag appropriate, if there is
> consensus in the project that it's not feel free to remove the tags again.
>
Testing-proposed-updates is built against testing, and once testing
becomes stable, I would expect that stable can rebuild itself.
Are you implying that the issue is known and is transient (aka fixed
in unstable, pending migration to testing) or the fact is that the
package cannot be built in testing and you don't care even when that
becomes stable and/or requires testing-proposed-updates
> I will not participate further in this discussion on -devel, so please
> do not CC me.
>
ok
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
Reply to: