On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 08:50:05PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > > Do you also object to DSA using puppet for configuration management? I don't. In fact I wasnt aware puppet is under "non-free" CLA as well. > There are significant pieces of free software where there exists > commercial and proprietary offerings either extending the software > directly or building on it by offering various value adds. As long as > the project is run like a free software project, I don't see a problem > with this, in particular for the second version, where the value add > exists in the form of, say, extra server-side analytics tools. I think > it's problematic if enhancements are rejected because it would make the > free version compete with the non-free version, which seems to more > often be the case for software where the proprietary offering extends > the software directly. I guess I agree. -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature