[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: opinions of snappy packages

On Jun 22, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote:

> Given that snapd therefore seems to be, in practice, only usable by
> Canonical's server, shouldn't the package be in contrib instead of
> main?
No: this was discussed the first time ~15 years ago IIRC for ICQ 
clients, and I do not think that anything has changed since then.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: