Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:53, Christiaan de Die le Clercq wrote:
> >
> > On 06/08/2016 10:39 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > > On 8 June 2016 at 10:08, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > >>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
> > >>> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
> > >>> system. But maybe I am alone with that oppinion.
> > >> You're not alone. The open core approach of Gitlab worries me greatly.
> > >>
> > >> (I'm just a random Debian developer. I no particular say in this.)
> > > +1
> > +1
> > Though I am not involved in this discussion and didn't read a lot of
> > previous emails about this. I am going to assume it would be hosted on
> > Debian's servers and not with Gitlab's hosted services. We use Gogs at
> > the office, a (MIT licensed) Gitlab alternative.
> > https://github.com/gogits/gogs
> > It might be worth checking out.
>
> +1
>
> We also tried Gogs and it works very well and looks promising but we
> didn't yet moved our repos from gitolite to gogs so I can't tell for
> sure would it be good for Debian. IMHO, it is worth some investigation.
I am a heavy gogs user, but its feature set is currently too limited and it
is not as adaptable as I would like. I am also not sure how it will scale
with more than 20.000 [1] git repos.
Just my 2 cent
Alex
[1]
grep -c repo.url cgitrc.repos
23092
>
Reply to: