Re: Packaging of static libraries

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging of static libraries
From: Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 06:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] nefhbn$6su$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20160410070536.GC31278@an3as.eu> <[🔎] 570A54E2.8000907@sceal.ie> <[🔎] 20160410220814.GA5471@glandium.org> <[🔎] 570B39CD.6020207@sceal.ie>

On 2016-04-11, Alastair McKinstry <alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie> wrote:
> What uses require PIC static libraries that cannot be satisfied by building
> -static --whole-archive ?

Linking a static library into a dynamic library.

/Sune

Reply to:

References:
- Packaging of static libraries
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: Packaging of static libraries
  - From: Alastair McKinstry <alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie>
- Re: Packaging of static libraries
  - From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Re: Packaging of static libraries
  - From: Alastair McKinstry <alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie>

Prev by Date: RFA: storaged -- Disk Manager
Next by Date: Re: Packaging of static libraries
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging of static libraries
Next by thread: Re: Packaging of static libraries
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread