Re: Going ahead with non-free-firmware
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 09:15:45PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 09, Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:51:08AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > I think there was consensus to introduce the non-free-firmware section
> > > and move the non-free firmware blobs there. I'm wondering what we need
> > > to do next?
> > I applaud this call for action; I'd certainly be an enthusiastic
> > user.
> Me too, it's too bad that it took almost 15 years to reach a consensus
> over what I proposed at the time.
I kept suggesting the same, but thought that it'd need a GR because of
"non-free" and "contrib" being listed explicitly in DFSG §5. Happy to
see that this wasn't actually necessary. :)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
Reply to: