On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 08:25:21AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > I kept suggesting the same, but thought that it'd need a GR because of > "non-free" and "contrib" being listed explicitly in DFSG §5. Happy to > see that this wasn't actually necessary. :) One of the points of the non-free/firmware naming was precisely to make it clear that it's just a subset of what is already mentioned in SC §5. Introducing (what looks like) a new section would incur in the issue you just mentioned. I don't remember anyone proposing to highlight a specific subset of non-free, rather then introducing a new archive area, in the discussions of years ago, but maybe it's just me. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature