On 03/01/16 22:33, Philip Hands wrote: > Daniel Reurich <daniel@centurion.net.nz> writes: > > ... >> Because systemd doesn't work without /usr on the root partition isn't a >> good reason either. > > You are right ... it is a poor reason, because it is pure fantasy. Then why is it that since the introduction of systemd is having /usr on a separate partition suddenly considered evil and systemd complains loudly about it. It always has worked and does work fine for me with sysvinit >> That just means systemd is broken by design and needs to be fixed. > > If what you claimed were true, then I'd agree with you, but since all > the systems I've upgraded to systemd have a separate /usr, and are > working without any issue whatsoever, this drivel can be safely ignored. > Then what's the problem and why are we even having this conversation about merged /usr??? -- Daniel Reurich Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd. 021 797 722
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature