Lucas Nussbaum: > On 28/12/15 at 14:24 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> qa-vcs_but_not_git_or_svn.txt (290 packages) >>> >>> The package is maintained using a VCS, which is not either Git or SVN. >> >> This one is really bellow pedantic... > > I agree. And this could also apply to "still using classic debhelper" > and "package still using 1.0 format that would not really benefit from > any major improvement by moving to 3.0". > > However, as I already argued back in 2013[1], I think that it would be very > useful for lintian to track such things, maybe as a below-than-pedantic > level (in [1], Jakub Wilk suggested a "F" (feature) tag, as in "it's not > a bug, it's a feature"). > > If we had that, it means that the work I did could simply be done by > running lintian on snapshot.debian.org, and tracking the popularity of > interesting tags. And that it would be very easy to change the level of > such tags when something moves from "new way to do $thing" to "suggested > ew way to do $thing" to "recommended way to do $thing". > > I think I would even try to implement that in lintian myself if there > was willingness from the lintian maintainers to accept such a change. > > Lucas > Hi Lucas, I believe that feature requested ended up also(?) wanting to track actual properties of the package. I.e. it would state a fact about the package rather than declaring said "fact" an issue. * I would have no issue with Lintian being able to list (non-issue) "facts" about packages. - It would be useful to compute stats about packages in general and have a framework for that. * I am less convinced that a "lower-than-pedantic" severity will do us any good. From my PoV, it just adds (albeit minor) complexity and inflation of the severities in lintian. - For one, we'll have to add yet another cmd option/-L argument for people to get *all* (issue-related) tags, which last until the next time someone feels that a given tag is "lower-than-the- severity-lower-than-pedantic". In summary, extending lintian to emit a type "fact" tag would be very welcome from my PoV. Please do let me know if you need help with that. Lintian probably assumes that tags are issues in quite a few places. Thanks ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature