Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?
From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:13:10 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20150510131310.0645230010a4140234026b19@debian.or.jp>

Hi,

 Why debian-policy has not been gettexted?
 Just a curious :)


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?
  - From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Re: Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?
  - From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>
- Re: Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?
  - From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Q: why binary-log by systemd-journald is not enabled by default?
Next by Date: Re: Developer repositories for Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Heads up: Upcoming dpkg-buildpackage -j precedence change
Next by thread: Re: Q: any reason for debian-policy non-i18n-ed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread