Hi, Quoting Niels Thykier (2015-04-11 09:20:36) > On 2015-04-11 07:14, Niels Thykier wrote: > > [...] > > > >> Stretch is a two year time frame though, which makes me kinda sad. Thanks > >> for you effort though, keep up the amazing work! If I understand correctly, if > >> it would have been something for stretch, either A or B would have been > >> decided already and partly implemented, right? > > > > I believe we can implement this for Stretch if we wanted to. Unlike > > multi-arch, build-profiles (etc.), ddebs are already supported by our > > (14-days-from-now-new) stable release. Namely, > > > > * All the groundwork requirements (pkg:arch dependencies etc.) are > > already covered by previous efforts. > > - I.e. everything that would require a full-cycle for support are > > already done in time for Jessie > > > > Hah, I take that inside the parentheses back. It seems that APT is > *not* very happy with the generated "pkg:arch" dependencies. > Fortunately, this syntax is not required for ddebs. this might be #777760 which is fixed in apt in experimental. cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature