Re: systemd, again

[Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>]

Hi,

http@shaw.ca:
> Most people who are not OK with systemd have better things to than try to
> persuade debian-devel that the debian prject's transition to it is
> problematic, and at more than just the implementation level.
> 
By now, I would sure hope so.

> More important than numbers is content.  The objections being raised seem
> diverse, dire and cogent, while the defenses seem to be mere vague
> reassurances expressed in tones just as dismissive as yours was just there.
> 
The operative word is "seem". I quoted the word 'discussion' because,
frankly, for both sides of this argument, the other side is the one who
expresses mere vague reassurances|objections while ignoring relevant
facts.

-- 
-- Matthias Urlichs