On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:45:55PM -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > On 19/11/14 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> 1) the problem with new feature in systemd which considers all > >> filesystems in fstab vital for system boot and stops boot if they > >> fail. It's been decided that although it is a change in behaviour > >> that might render some systems unbootable it's technically correct > >> implementation and only enforces that non-vital filesystems are > >> marked as such in fstab which should have been the case from the > >> start. > > As regards the two issues you've described: the first is not a bug. > > It's a necessary change in how we view the boot in a truly > > event-driven system. There is no sane default policy for how to > > interpret entries in /etc/fstab on upgrade except to regard them as > > all mandatory - *but* it's important that the admin be given the > > opportunity to intervene to override this policy. > Question: is it safe to say that systemd doesn't yet support the full > /etc/fstab specification from util-linux [1]? .... No? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature