Re: Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]
From: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:36:15 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 5478885F.9020504@NTLWorld.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 546E6113.2010703@alvarezp.ods.org>
References: <[🔎] 546E6113.2010703@alvarezp.ods.org>

Octavio Alvarez:

Question: is it safe to say  that systemd doesn't yet support the

> full /etc/fstab specification from util-linux [1]?

Yes; it's safe.  It's also wrong.  But it's quite safe.  (-:

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]
  - From: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>