Re: Arch-dependent files in /usr/share
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 03:11:12PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> But the broader point is that if we stopped requiring this distinction,
> you could unwind those hacks as well. My guess is that would make
> maintaining the packages easier and would be preferrable from your
> perspective, although please do correct me if I'm wrong about that.
Indeed, you are right.
Even the existing ones gave headaches at times (especially the icons/images_*
which broke not that long ago when being in /usr/share (well, actually being
symlinks...).
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: