On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:59:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > IMO the proper solution is for Debian packaging of doxygen to untangle > jQuery from extensions, depend on + symlink the jQuery part, provide the > extensions as a shared package, and patch doxygen code to generate > docuementation referencing each separately instead of the entangled one. > > ...but seems from that README that maintainers of doxygen have already > reflected on this and disagrees. > > I suggest (but won't drive it myself) to file a bug against doxygen to > kindly reconsider... > > ...and until eventually maybe progress on that front, either a) try > untangle the jquery+extensions code yourself for each and every single > package using doxygen, or b) embrace same attitude as doxygen > maintainers and add lintian suppressions referencing doxygen README as > comment. > > > I suspect there's nothing new in what I write here - that you've already > come to same conclusion yourself before posting do devel - sorry that I > have no better input. :-/ This is the place in which I remind people javascript-common with multiple versions of jQuery would reduce maintainer burden and avoid filling the archive with tons of binaries if someone has a spare few hours. For jessie+1 I guess. -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature