[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)

Theodore Ts'o writes ("Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)"):
> I assume that posh meets the strict definition of 10.4.  And so
> without actually changing policy, someone _could_ try setting /bin/sh
> to be /bin/posh, and then start filing RC bugs against packages that
> have scripts that break.   Yes?

Why would such bugs be release-critical ?


Reply to: