On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:21:45 +0200 Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > Those who are most impacted are sys admins of servers, and upstream > > developers > > I’m both, and I joined Debian to try to make an impact… > > > - the two communities most impacted, but that seem to have no say > > in the matter. > > … but even then, am drowned by the masses. > > (I did not have the chance to Second the GR proposal > because I was not even aware that there *was* one.) https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/ Same procedure as previous calls for GR: debian-vote mailing list. If it had received some public seconds, it would have had a wider announcement and a listing on https://www.debian.org/vote/ https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/03/msg00000.html After a lot of discussion, resulting in: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/03/msg00188.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/03/msg00189.html "Withdrawal of Proposal" Lack of support for the GR (from those entitled to vote upon the GR) was the declared reason for withdrawal. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature