Re: upgrades must not change the installed init system [was: Re: Cinnamon environment now available in testing]
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 13:04 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 11/09/14 14:36, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 21:36 +0000, Nick Phillips wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Debian has a good and hard-earned reputation for not messing up
> >> sysadmins' changes; upgrading to systemd - however wonderful it is (and
> >> I confess to having no opinion on that) - without at least a debconf
> >> prompt of a reasonable priority telling them what is about to happen and
> >> offering a bailout, is guaranteed to lose us reputation and users.
> > [...]
> >
> > I do agree that at least some kind of high-priority notice is needed.
> >
> > Ben.
> >
>
> Unfortunately systemd maintainers don't agree on this. (#747535)
As you can see from that bug report the systemd maintainers overrides
every attempt to change severity of that bug to wishlist and wontfix.
Is it possible to reassign this bug to the CTTE, as the systemd-shim |
systemd-sysv debate was in #762194 as a follow-up of the libpam-systemd
bug #746578. Do you have to be a member of the CTTE to do this?
Reply to: