On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 17:44 +0100, Noel Torres wrote: > On Wednesday, 10 de September de 2014 03:12:16 Ben Hutchings escribió: > > On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 21:24 +0100, Noel Torres wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 9 de September de 2014 21:18:55 Tollef Fog Heen escribió: > > > > ]] Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez > > > > > > > > > But if you don't (Is not uncommon to have servers on remote locations > > > > > that are only accessible via ssh) and the machine don't boots > > > > > properly you can find yourself in trouble. > > > > > > > > Then surely you test the upgrade before making it live, using kvm > > > > -snapshot or similar functionality? > > > > > > This is simply not possible in physical live, productions servers on > > > remote CPDs. > > > > In that case you test on your staging server first... > > > > Ben. > > IF you have an staging server... some clients simply do not pay for it. Then they already accepted the risk of extended downtime during an upgrade. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part