Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
- To: email@example.com
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
- From: Ian Jackson <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 13:09:24 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20140731233851.GC28448@falafel.plessy.net>
- References: <53D7CF25.email@example.com> <38022338.xExGetmtcr@eee> <53D80EDA.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <53D82293.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <CAKcBoksdj+bEzT9bkGbLSD41JxAhSSwmNjMna5_qWU+HBupaDw@mail.gmail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CAKcBoktBiPqUEsgOnvkT3pEMt1AbPhKOf-vCTT1BS-ni458sEg@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com> <20140731233851.GC28448@falafel.plessy.net>
Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian"):
> Le Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:29:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > Based purely on security evaluations by others that I was able to find on
> > the web, FFmpeg appears to be better at the moment than libav on the
> > security front (although libav appears to be trying to catch up).
> Hello everybody
> At that point, and given the impressive number of users who
> expressed interest for having FFmpeg in Debian (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/729203), I think that it would be fair to ask
> the libav maintainers to provide arguments on whether to distribute
> both libraries or make a choice, even if it is against their own
> interest since they may see their packages removed at the end.
> Otherwise we are in that kind of frequent Debianesque situation where the
> winning strategy is to stay silent as long as possible.