Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 03:20:07 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140801012007.GA25417@bongo.bofh.it>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <877g2trtse.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- References: <53D7CF25.3040901@googlemail.com> <38022338.xExGetmtcr@eee> <53D80EDA.8040207@googlemail.com> <87ppgnhmym.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <53D82293.7010707@googlemail.com> <1406836447.13071.3.camel@kagura.malsain.org> <CAKcBoksdj+bEzT9bkGbLSD41JxAhSSwmNjMna5_qWU+HBupaDw@mail.gmail.com> <87tx5xrw0u.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <CAKcBoktBiPqUEsgOnvkT3pEMt1AbPhKOf-vCTT1BS-ni458sEg@mail.gmail.com> <877g2trtse.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
On Aug 01, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
> I personally don't have enough information to know why libav was chosen
> instead of FFmpeg, and the discussion on debian-devel so far has mostly
> come from FFmpeg advocates. So there's probably another side to the story
> that hasn't been stated here yet.
Probably because there are no libav advocates other than the libav
developers...
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: