Re: New project goal: Get rid of Berkeley DB (post jessie)
On 06/21/2014 01:03 AM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:49:52AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> So, do I understand well that it's your view that just linking with
>> AGPLv3 make it mandatory to re-license using AGPLv3? Is there such a
>> clause in the AGPLv3 license?
>>
>
> No, it's required to re-licence it to AGPLv3, or an AGPLv3 compatable
> licence. See, for example,
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL and
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
>
> Neil
Thank you, it makes sense now.
Thomas
Reply to: