[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: About a mass bug report not based on Sid or Jessie.



On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:14:57PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> > (a) Diffs are not made to be readable, they are made to update
> > things. As those diffs are the result of an automatic processs, you
> > should only need to look at the updated file, not at the diff.
> > Moreover, if they are unreadable, so are the file being diffed itself.
> > Being readable should not be a concern here.
> 
> This is absolutely not true in Debian's processes.  Both the release team
> and the security team use diffs as first-class artifacts for doing code
> review.

Furthermore, third-parties use Debian's diffs as the basis for security
and feature patches.  At work, we ship a slightly modified version of
Debian's timezone patches for PHP, and we also have used Debian's
security patches as well.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: