Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:43:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140415184320.GA3661@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140415180727.GA10412@virgil.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 534D0341.5050807@balintreczey.hu> <[🔎] 534D5B1A.3070408@debian.org> <[🔎] 20140415180727.GA10412@virgil.dodds.net>

* Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, 2014-04-15, 11:07:

But I don't imagine that you're going to get signoff on a dpkg"amd64-secure" architecture,


"amd64-secure"? Why not "amd64-asbestos-free"?

--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

References:
- Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian
  - From: Balint Reczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>
- Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#744885: ITP: erlang-p1 -- set of Erlang libraries from ProcessOne
Next by Date: Re: Having fun with the following C code (UB)
Previous by thread: Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian
Next by thread: Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread