On 2014-03-10 13:05:30, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On March 10, 2014 06:27:01 PM Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > Also, am I too pragmatic in suggesting that we should accept non-source > > files in tarballs if they are legally distributed and not used during > > the build (especially not included in the binary packages)? > > I generally take that approach. If there's a concern about tainting the > binary package, then I put a rule in debian/rules to make sure the offending > file is removed before building. Hi all, Some time ago there was discussion about minified js on d-mentors and from what I know conclusion was that if orig.tar.gz contains any of this type of files it should be repacked and version should be +dfsg. Explanation about it should be in README.source. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature