I'm sure this isn't the right way to do it, but I put up the tarballs and dscs and a couple pages that link to them. http://www.vin-dit.org/~jholland/tarballs.html http://www.vin-dit.org/~jholland/dscs.html You have to build them (and install after building) in the order given at enlightenment.org due to dependencies. Advice on how to do this right would be welcome! John n Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:26:00 -0500 John Holland <jholland@vin-dit.org> wrote: > I thought they would be set up automatically when I made the repo. I > just tried to get source with apt-get source from my repo and it said > no source package available. What is the right way to add source > packages to the repo? > > > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:10:25 -0800 "Schlacta, Christ" > <aarcane@aarcane.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:51 PM, John Holland <jholland@vin-dit.org> > > wrote: > > > > > I got some debs built for E 18 not 17 gby oing from the source on > > > enlightenment.org and building them on Wheezy. They've been > > > working pretty well for me on a couple machines. > > > > > Thank you for the suggestion, but I'm strictly attempting to stick > > to backporting packages from Jessie to maintain upgradability later. > > > > > > > > > You might want to look at the E18 situation because many of the > > > dependencies for E17 have been combined into one tarball that will > > > build them all at once. I had some previous attempts to make E17 > > > debs and the number of dependencies is pretty overwhelming. E18 > > > made it a lot easier. > > > > > > > I was a bit dismayed with the extent of the build process :( > > > > I do look forward to E18 making it into Jessie now. > > > > > > > my debs are at www.vin-dit.org (instructions on the web page) > > > > > > > > Do you have dscs for building from source? > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:34:54 -0800 > > > "Schlacta, Christ" <aarcane@aarcane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 2014 10:19 AM, "Neil Williams" <codehelp@debian.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:05:41 -0800 > > > > > "Schlacta, Christ" <aarcane@aarcane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how to handle this complex dependency of each > > > > > > package on previous packages in the complex build process > > > > > > > > > > Keep building all packages in a loop, remove the package from > > > > > the loop when it has been built, repeat. The order of the loop > > > > > barely matters. > > > > > > > > > > The problems are that programs are build-dependencies of > > > > > libraries which have -dev packages which are > > > > > build-dependencies of programs. There are tools which can > > > > > identify dependency loops, but for a single run, it is just > > > > > as effective to try everything, rebuild everything which > > > > > broke and repeat, repeat, repeat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not quite the problem. Insofar as I can tell, all the > > > > dependencies form a nice pretty tree. > > > > > > > > I just need the output from each package to build the next, and > > > > I'm looking for an automated way to do that in pbuilder > > > > > > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature