Re: Bug#727708: Fsck SystemD and its developers and its users. GR to override this please.
On 02/11/2014 07:23 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> IMO (and I'm an interested part / GNOME dude, so no say): blocking
> progress is bad. So if someone wants to add OpenRC scripts to packages
> and maintenance is low: as packager you should be allowing that to
> happen. As long as the time required on packagers part is minimal. Only
> by not blocking progress things can move to working nicely. But that
> also means that it really falls under the task of people interested in
> something different to make such change happen. At the moment there is
> too much "blocking progress" going on IMO
Yes, I agree with what's above.
On 02/11/2014 08:13 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Yes, but we are not talking about hypothetical things. I am also not
> planning my life for the case that I am winning the lottery tomorrow.
Chances to win the lottery are 1 against 14 000 000 (at least in my
country). Claiming this kind of odds for supporting OpenRC is IMO an
overstatement, especially considering that we have LSB header scripts
for *all* of our packages right now.
Cheers,
Thomas
Reply to: