On Ma, 11 feb 14, 00:31:18, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Leaving most things to just use the sysvinit compatibility layer means > not realizing one of the more important benefits of the default init > system if it should in fact turn out to be systemd. > > So at best you're talking about maintaining two for every daemon. That > is still roughly twice the maintenance work and twice the testing. > > Not saying I like it, but that is where choice hurts Debian. Perhaps > having the choice will also help Debian enough to make it worthwhile. According to Russ Allbery, it's easier to maintain both systemd and upstart declarations than one sysv init script. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature