Re: alternative debian/rules

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: alternative debian/rules
From: Игорь Пашев <pashev.igor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:42:06 +0400
Message-id: <[🔎] CALL-Q8z603EAhb86khzjAfOY1XvO42A+Li_V5mrjUx=W+uQ9dQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130405114149.GA7097@angband.pl>
References: <[🔎] CALL-Q8zdmE0i22QwGjxjrBsTQXehk03ZGCr+xB+6d5Z59N9JWA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20130405114149.GA7097@angband.pl>

2013/4/5 Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>:
> The policy says


Indeed.

So, in any case one can use its own tool just like dh:

%:
    debian/megatool $@

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: alternative debian/rules
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

References:
- alternative debian/rules
  - From: Игорь Пашев <pashev.igor@gmail.com>
- Re: alternative debian/rules
  - From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

Prev by Date: SI units (was: failure to communicate)
Next by Date: threads, Subjects: and mailers (was Re: SI units (was Re: failure to communicate))
Previous by thread: Re: alternative debian/rules
Next by thread: Re: alternative debian/rules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread