On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:58 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Doesn't look like something to be run in d-i. > > As I understand it, isenkram is just a proof of concept of the idea. > It also seems to be a reimplementation of discover? > > > discover already pulls virtualbox bits in. Mentioned not so long ago in: > > https://lists.debian.org/20130726091036.GB22819@mraw.org > > Aha, so that is where I should file a patch for installing > thinkfan/etc on Thinkpads when installing with d-i. [...] I strongly oppose installing, by default, any userland program that takes over such low-level hardware control. (Yes, that includes X with UMS. But that will have to be grandfathered for now.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part