Re: optimizing PNGs
On Wed, 29 May 2013, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES
> <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> wrote:
> > not sure about svgz... On a typical svg file:
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 452K mai 28 18:48 display-im6.svg
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 103K mai 28 18:48 display-im6.svg.gz
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 297K mai 29 09:42 optimised.svg
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 81K mai 29 09:43 optimised.svg.gz
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 289K mai 29 09:50 scour.svg
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 90K mai 29 09:51 scour.svg.gz
>
> With a lossy (decimal truncation to 3) the saving are even more important:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 234K mai 29 09:52 scour.svg
> -rw-r--r-- 1 bastien bastien 54K mai 29 09:53 scour.svg.gz
Right. So SVGZ is smaller than just scour, and both is smaller than just
SVGZ by about 10-20% unless you do a lossy conversion.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
We want 6. 6 is the 1.
-- "The Prisoner (2009 Miniseries)" _Checkmate_
Reply to: