[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: optimizing PNGs



Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-05-28 19:05:11)
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
> > Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> writes:
> >
> >> I'd like to add some bits from the doxygen point of view. 
> >> Documentation packages created using doxygen currently have a 
> >> number of issues with respect to size. Some of them are to be 
> >> addressed soon(TM).
> >
> >>  * Packages shipping .md5 and .map files. Even though these files 
> >>    are small, there can be very many of them adding up to the 
> >>    installation size for filesystems with large block sizes. These 
> >>    files are used for incremental recreation of the documentation, 
> >>    so they are completely useless in a binary package. A future 
> >>    version of the doxygen package will include a dh_doxygen to aid 
> >>    in getting rid of these files.
> >
> > Yes, yes, please!  That would make my life so much better for 
> > several of my packages.
> >
> >>  * The embedding of jquery and files from doxygen is another story 
> >>    with wider implications, but this is rather a small constant per 
> >>    package, so the reduction in size is negligible.
> >
> > I've been replacing the copy of jquery with a symlink to the one 
> > shipped in Debian and adding a dependency on that package, and some 
> > quick testing didn't turn up anything that broke.  If that strategy 
> > works, maybe dh_doxygen can do that as well?
> 
> optimizing the svg file by removing all space and comments ?
> 
> from http://petercollingridge.appspot.com/svg-editor/ we could gain
> about 20%-50% per svg file
> or this
> https://github.com/svg/svgo

We already have an SVG optimizer in the archive: python-scour

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: