On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 20:51 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Or 'source', short for 'the build-dependency's source code should be > > treated as part of my source code'. This is already reserved as a > > special architecture name for use in changes file. > > Hmm, if it's reserved, what use it is reserved for? Wouldn't want to > step on toes. I can't find where it's reserved in policy. [...] What I mean is that a changes file for a sourceful upload has 'source' (and maybe some real architecture names) in the Architecture field. Therefore 'source' cannot be assigned as the name of a real architecture. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part