Re: GFDL in main
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Jakub Wilk <email@example.com> wrote:
> * Serafeim Zanikolas <firstname.lastname@example.org>, 2012-12-12, 10:30:
>> If I understand correctly, the way to go is to split every problematic
>> source package in two different source packages, one for main (shipping
>> programs) and another for non-free (shipping documentation), with the main
>> package suggesting the non-free one.
> First one should ask upstream if they are willing to relicense the
> documentation. If they are not, then removing the documentation or moving it
> into a non-free package is the only option left.
A point of clarification: Relicensing can include an additional
license, thus making the documentation dual (or multi) licensed.