Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 06:54:08 +1300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20121201175408.GF17068@tal>
- In-reply-to: <20121129144041.GA18983@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- References: <50A30C23.1070900@debian.org> <50A52FEF.4070200@debian.org> <20121124155750.GA14735@spruce.wiehl.oeko.net> <20121124161524.GA5448@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20121124170302.GB10163@spruce.wiehl.oeko.net> <20121124173011.GA5909@physik.fu-berlin.de> <50B230CA.2020108@debian.org> <20121125150321.GA13477@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20121129142102.GA383@grep.be> <20121129144041.GA18983@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:40:41PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> the discussion that systemd is a bad design because it uses the same
> configuration file syntax as Windows ini files or XDG .desktop files,
> adding the statement that these are too difficult to parse.
If you are refering to my post:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg00700.html
Please read it again, and read it all the way through.
My post was in response to the statement:
"It is only me who thinks that it is going by Windows steps?"
in post:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg00681.html
JFTR, it was your post:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg00701.html
which sparked the discussion regarding the merits of .ini vs .xml.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: