Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- To: Josselin Mouette <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 09:52:35 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20121201085235.GD23005@grep.be>
- In-reply-to: <1354201085.30332.2.camel@tomoyo>
- References: <20121124155750.GA14735@spruce.wiehl.oeko.net> <20121124161524.GA5448@physik.fu-berlin.de> <50B1A41F.email@example.com> <20121125073521.GA10730@physik.fu-berlin.de> <50B2283B.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20121125144219.GA13275@physik.fu-berlin.de> <50B2508F.email@example.com> <20121125174945.GA14691@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20121129142421.GB383@grep.be> <1354201085.30332.2.camel@tomoyo>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 15:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > Now if someone wants to fork the particular bits of upstream software so
> > making use of a separate /usr is still possible, even if you think it's
> > totally useless, are you going to stop them.
> Wouter, I think higher of you than someone who’d bring again the /usr
> argument which has already been debunked to death.
I'm not trying to do that; I was merely trying to demonstrate the
benfits of forking etc. I couldn't care less about whether or not /usr
is separate, since I've stopped using separate partitions years ago.
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and
save on postage.