On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > Should we maybe try again? As Ansgar > mentioned in one bugreport, the license is considered non-free not only > by us, but by Fedora as well[1] (and it's also notOSI-recognized) FWIW, by FSF too: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#JSON -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature