Re: [PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's packages
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Unless we're having some heavyweight process with multiple pings
>> etc. (which we IMO shouldn't) the way the maintainer might first
>> discover that someone feels the package needs to be orphaned is by the
>> ITO bug. The maintainer needs to have a good chance to object.
> Why should a maintainer who ignored several other bugs should be
> astonished about such kind of a bug?
> OK, if you want a chance for objection: Lets add to the procedure an
> upload to DELAYED/15 which gives another two weeks time to react. I
> definitely think that somebody who really is in the mood of salvaging
> a package and has some momentum should not be delayed a longer time
> than two weeks to start with some action.
That is essentially my proposal then.
Maybe we need a DELAYED/30 (or more) queue for orphaning uploads?