[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PROPOSAL v2] Orphaning another maintainer's packages

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Andreas Tille  wrote:
>> Unless we're having some heavyweight process with multiple pings
>> etc. (which we IMO shouldn't) the way the maintainer might first
>> discover that someone feels the package needs to be orphaned is by the
>> ITO bug.  The maintainer needs to have a good chance to object.
> Why should a maintainer who ignored several other bugs should be
> astonished about such kind of a bug?
> OK, if you want a chance for objection:  Lets add to the procedure an
> upload to DELAYED/15 which gives another two weeks time to react.  I
> definitely think that somebody who really is in the mood of salvaging
> a package and has some momentum should not be delayed a longer time
> than two weeks to start with some action.

That is essentially my proposal then.

Maybe we need a DELAYED/30 (or more) queue for orphaning uploads?

Best wishes,

Reply to: