Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - skipping pointless delay
Bart Martens writes ("Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - skipping pointless delay"):
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:50:46PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 3. Wait for objections
> For how long ? The proposal includes collecting ACKs so that any pointless
> delay can be skipped, resulting in the package being salvaged sooner.
I was thinking some weeks.
I do think this delay is essential, not pointless. It is there to
allow a maintainer who wishes to resist the orphaning to do so.