Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - without objection versus requiring ACKs
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Why not start with a "without objection" standard and see how it works?
The "without objection" approach would require a reasonable delay for people to
raise objections (some say two months). The ACK/NACK approach allows to reach
a consensus in a shorter time, so that for obvious cases the salvaging can
proceed without pointless delay.
Regards,
Bart Martens
Reply to: