On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 20:59 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Anything that's X dash is most likely non-standard. Of course,... I referred to that other RFCs may still expect the "experimental" semantics of "X-" > It can't AIUI, but this is mostly about future usage and not going back and > creating a lot of namespace churn. I just quickly read over the RFC, but it seemed to be doing just that?! On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:18 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > What RFCs are you thinking of? The "X-" stuff was removed from e-mail > standards long time ago, IIRC. Well I don't have all RFCs in mind,... but weren't there others, that gave "x-" that meaning for e.g. MIME types or URI schemas? Cheers, Chris.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature