Re: choice in core infrastructure decisions (Re: Bug#684396: ITP: openrc -- alternative boot mechanism)
On 08/11/2012 10:29 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 11, Thomas Goirand <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> the programs are systemd and udev. If we can have an alternative,
>> Please stop saying "we". *You* are not Debian. Thanks.
> Pot. Kettle. Black.
It would be nice if you could explain to the readers
in what way I have spoken in the name of Debian by
writing "If we can have alternatives". Or maybe you
totally missed the "if" in my sentence, showing an
hypothesis? What if I write "If there was" instead of
"if we can have"?
No, I'm not at all guilty of the very thing that I accused
you, contrary to what you are trying to demonstrate here.
Also, this long thread has started because you started
writing on the name of everyone else. If you don't want
to make a fool of yourself, I would suggest you to stop
doing so. I don't think I'm the only one to think this way
also (this huge thread also demonstrates it).